![]() iMatch, Photosupreme, Adobe Bridge, database eg. I've been playing around with storing the information in a spreadsheet, some sort of image database eg. Icing on the cake would be add the ability to store the information in the metadata of the image so the information is available if I upload or send the image somewhere. Image of baptism or marriage or burial register Ideally I'd want to be able to record the parish name and whether the image was: I was wondering what might be the best way to index them so I can quickly find the image later. Many images have names of interest, be they brides, grooms, witnesses, mothers and fathers. Typically they are several hundred, comprising baptisms, marriages and burials for each parish in the area I'm researching. Those cases involve Prince’s unauthorized use of Instagram photos, and likewise center on issues of transformation and fair use.I've a collection of church register images that I've downloaded during visits to my local Family History centre. The decision comes just days after a court ruled that two suits against noted appropriation artist Richard Prince could proceed. The case has been closely watched, as it is expected to have wide-ranging repercussions for artists whose work is themed around appropriation. Going forward, we will continue standing up for the rights of artists to create transformative works under the Copyright Act and the First Amendment.” At the same time, we welcome the Court’s clarification that its decision is limited to that single licensing and does not question the legality of Andy Warhol’s creation of the Prince Series in 1984. In a statement provided to Artforum, Warhol Foundation president Joe Wachs said: “We respectfully disagree with the Court’s ruling that the 2016 licensing of Orange Prince was not protected by the fair use doctrine. Writing for the majority, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor noted that “Lynn Goldsmith’s original works, like those of other photographers, are entitled to copyright protection, even against famous artists.” “That is so both because judges are typically unsuited to make aesthetic judgments and because such perceptions are inherently subjective.” “The district judge should not assume the role of art critic and seek to ascertain the intent behind or meaning of the works at issue,” wrote Judge Gerard Lynch of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. She was moved to sue when, following Prince’s untimely 2016 death, Vanity Fair ran another work from the series, Orange Prince, in a commemorative issue, paying the Warhol Foundation $10,000 for the privilege, but failing to credit or compensate Goldsmith.Ī New York federal district judge originally ruled in favor of Warhol on the grounds that the Pop artist’s work was sufficiently transformative and thus fell within the realm of “fair use.” Goldsmith appealed and was allowed to continue her suit. ![]() According to Goldsmith, Warhol did not seek her permission to use her photo for the sixteen-part series, nor did he offer her credit or recompense. A single work from the series, Purple Fame, ran in the magazine, and the photographer was credited. ![]() ![]() Warhol created the series while on assignment for Vanity Fair, whose parent company, Conde Nast, licensed the photo from Goldsmith for onetime use, paying her $400. I expect biased answers here :-) but my initial impression is that imatch is the product that power users will love, and photo supreme is for those who are overwhelmed by imatch and don't need all the features. Goldsmith alleged that the late Pop artist illegally used her 1981 photo of the Royal Purple One in his 1984 “Prince Series,” a series of sixteen screen prints featuring the rock icon’s visage. July 12, 2021, 08:49:22 PM Hello, In my search for a lightroom replacement it has come down to these two products. The decision had been hotly anticipated in the wake of the Court’s October 12, 2022, hearing of the case, which Goldsmith originally launched six years ago in New York State. The US Supreme Court today ruled 7-2 against the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts regarding the question of whether Warhol’s use in his own work of a photo of the musician Prince by Lynn Goldsmith constitutes fair use. Supreme Court Rules Against Warhol Foundation in Landmark Copyright Case
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |